How not to get readers for your blog
Readers of Business Week magazine have been told this week that blogging is dead. And who told them that? An executive from Google – and not just any executive either. According to the product manager
Readers of Business Week magazine have been told this week that blogging is dead. And who told them that? An executive from Google – and not just any executive either. According to the product manager
Business executives speak a different language to the rest of the world. Indeed, in recent years there has been a whole new development of words that sound highly impressive but actually say nothing. You can
Television viewers in the UK may have noticed something strange last night. One of the most popular television programmes for the past 25 years is clearly becoming much less important to the nation. The programme
Women do the bulk of shopping. Study after study reveals that, in general, men dislike shopping. Even when men go shopping for things they say they like, such as cars, research shows that in most
124 City Road, London EC1V 2NX | Tel: 0118 336 9710
Affiliate Links: Some of the links in this website are affiliate links providing me with a small commission when you purchase an item. I only use affiliate links for products which I personally value. Amazon: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Images: Images from Amazon, Canva, Fotolia, Free Digital Photos, Freepik,
FreeStockPhotos, Geograph, Pixabay, PxHere, StoryBlocks, Unsplash product suppliers or my own collection.
5 thoughts on “Internet Psychology and Marketing”
Some fascinating insights. On a purely technical note – is there a version of this presentation that’s a little more user friendly? I’d like to be able to pause and navigate to a particular section. Is this possible?
Thanks Steve. If you go to the following link you can pause and navigate through the entire presentation.
https://present.me/view/66105-internet-psychology
Many thanks – the timeline makes a big difference. I later realised the presentation above is navigable with some quirks!
The 0.56s judgment thing is particularly pertinent. Is there a reference for that?
I mentioned the 0.56 seconds in this article last year that has a reference to a paper in Nature.
http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2012/blog/internet-psychology/websites-should-appeal-to-individuals-i-e-you.html
However, there are other studies – I’ll see what I can dig out
Thanks again, I looked at the Nature article – the fact that people are making reasonably reliable decisions (or at least those matched by longer exposures) in just 0.05s is remarkable.
Comments are closed.