You cannot be addicted to the Internet

Psychiatrists are in an interesting position; their role is being threatened by the growth in clinical psychologists, therapists and a host of other health professionals who can treat certain psychological disorders. Earlier this week research was published which shows that cognitive behavioural therapy can have a lasting therapeutic impact. The trouble is CBT can be administered by therapists – you don’t have to be a psychiatrist to offer this “talking therapy”.

So, is it any wonder then that every so often psychiatrists attempt to get new disorders added to their Bible, the Diagnostics and Statistical Manual (DSM)? Earlier this year psychiatrists wanted “Internet Addiction” added to the DSM. Fantastic – get the word “addiction” into a diagnosis and it already implies you need medical intervention; enter the hero psychiatrist to the rescue.

OK, I’m being flippant I know, but to many of us who deal with the Internet day-in, day-out, the whole concept of Internet Addiction does seem somewhat over-egged. As I said in an article on Internet Addiction in March 2007, the evidence was exaggerated.

Now, a new “meta-analysis” looking at the past ten years of previous studies on Internet Addiction has concluded that much of the research that has provided the “evidence” is badly flawed. Indeed, it looks very much like that there is no such thing as Internet Addiction – despite what the psychiatrists’ manual might say.

It might well be possible to become addicted to online games, or to web-based family tree research, or to Internet research, but to be addicted to the Internet itself would be rather like saying we’re addicted to any other communications vehicle, such as speaking, or listening. Know any listening addicts, or letter writing addicts?

If the use of some part of the Internet is interfering with your daily living and withdrawing from that online activity causes physical symptoms in you, then there’s a chance you have a problem. But it looks like CBT could solve that anyway – so you don’t need a psychiatrist necessarily.

However, for most people who are emailing late at night, or Twittering away first thing in the morning, or poking people all day on Facebook, there is unlikely to be a problem. In fact, you’re quite normal.

Like this article?

Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Facebook
Share via email

Other posts that might be of interest

Internet users are at an advantage

Yesterday I was running a workshop where we looked at the kinds of things that were essential for children. We came to the conclusion that there wasn’t much essential, except clean water, protection from the

Read More »

Business Week on technology and culture

The McGraw Hill international weekly, Business Week, included comment from me today on the cultural differences in technological usage. I pointed out that the boardrooms of global businesses need a conceptual shift if they are

Read More »